Skip to content

AI News Β· Edition 68 Β·

When AI presses send: a made-up tip and what it teaches owners

Police say an AI posted a false tip to their site. Plus: Replit and Anthropic part ways, a reported 100x billing bug, and why benchmarks miss real work.

9 stories Β· sourced from Yahoo, TechCrunch, CBC, Hacker News and others

Abstract illustration accompanying When AI presses send: a made-up tip and what it teaches owners
Abstract illustration, generated with AI. It represents the idea, not the event.

The one that matters

Police say Anthropic's AI posted a fake tip on an unsolved-murders site. What can your AI send unchecked?

Yahoo β†—

What happened

Philadelphia police say an AI system from Anthropic, the company behind the Claude assistant, posted a tip on the city's website for unsolved murders. They also say the tip was made up. Several outlets have reported what the police said.

That is about all that is firmly established. The reporting so far doesn't say who set the AI running, what it was asked to do, or whether a person saw the tip before it was submitted. We won't guess. Even so, the outline matters, because it shows a change many owners haven't caught up with. AI tools no longer just write drafts for you to read. More and more of them can fill in forms, send messages and post content too.

What it means for your business

Every AI system in use today sometimes produces something that sounds confident, reads well and is false. When that happens in a draft, a person usually catches it. When the same tool is allowed to press 'submit', the mistake is out in the world before anyone has looked at it.

Think about where that could happen in your own operation:

  • A 30-bed clinic with a WhatsApp bot answering patients could tell someone a doctor is available on a day the doctor isn't in, or give the wrong instructions before a procedure.
  • A 600-student school using AI to write and send parent notices could announce the wrong exam date to every family at once.
  • A workshop with 40 staff that lets an AI assistant answer supplier emails could confirm a price, quantity or delivery date that nobody agreed to.

There is a second side to this. A police tip line received an invented submission that looked like a real one. Your contact form, reviews page, admissions enquiries and job applications can get the same kind of thing, written well enough that your staff act on it.

What it does not mean

It does not mean Anthropic's tools are uniquely unreliable. Every major chatbot makes things up at times. It does not mean you should switch off the AI tools your staff find useful for drafting, summarising or translating. And it is too early to say who is to blame, because we don't yet know how much a person was involved.

Expect two kinds of overstatement this week. Some people will use the story to argue that AI should be kept out of business entirely. More quietly, vendors will keep selling 'autonomous agents' that 'run your front desk' with nobody checking. Watch the second group. What separates a wrong draft from a wrong public post is a human check, and that check is exactly what those sales pitches remove.

What a sensible owner should do this month

  • Make a list. Write down every tool in your business that can send, post, submit or pay without a person approving it: website chat, WhatsApp bots, email auto-replies, social media schedulers, add-ons to your customer database. Ask your staff, because some of them may have switched these on themselves.
  • Put a person in front of anything public or binding. For any message that mentions prices, dates, fees, medical information or commitments, set the tool so it writes a draft and a person approves it. In a clinic or school, that might take 20 to 30 minutes of a front-desk worker's day. That is far cheaper than correcting a wrong message sent to 600 families.
  • Ask your vendors three questions in writing. Can your tool send or submit anything without our approval? Can that be switched off? Does it keep a record of everything it has sent?
  • Check incoming messages before acting on them. If acting on a lead, complaint or tip would cost you money or staff time, make a quick phone call first to confirm it is real.

None of this needs new software or a consultant. Many tools already have an approval setting, and the job is to find out whether yours is turned on. It costs a few hours of an owner's or manager's time this month. In return, you know that when your business says something in public, someone has read it first.

Also worth knowing

  1. Replit says it is no longer working with Anthropic

    Replit's CEO says the online coding platform is no longer working with Anthropic, and the reporting so far doesn't explain why. The lesson is wider than these two companies: many AI products you pay for run on another company's AI, and those deals can change. Ask any AI vendor you rely on whose AI their product runs on, and what happens to your service if that supplier changes.

    TechCrunch β†—

  2. Nova Scotia to host a large data centre powering Anthropic's Claude

    CBC reports that Nova Scotia will host a large data centre to power Anthropic's Claude assistant. For Canadian businesses this is regional economic news first. It does not by itself mean your data will be stored in Canada, so if that matters to you (clinics and schools handling personal records often have to care), ask your vendor where your data is processed and stored, and get the answer in writing.

    CBC β†—

  3. A user says Anthropic's billing console charged their card 100 times too much

    A user on Hacker News says Anthropic's Console charged their card 100 times the intended amount because of a bug in how it handled international input. It's one person's account and we haven't seen it confirmed. Still, software built around one country's habits can misread what people elsewhere type, so if you prepay for any AI service, use a separate low-limit card and turn on spending caps wherever they're offered.

    Hacker News β†—

  4. Most working hours go to tasks that AI benchmarks barely measure, a widely shared piece argues

    A piece widely discussed on Hacker News argues that about 90% of US working hours go to tasks that AI benchmarks, the test scores quoted in launch announcements, don't measure well. The point very likely holds in India and Canada too: a model that tops a leaderboard may still be no good at your front desk, your billing or your shop floor. Judge AI tools with a short trial on your own real tasks, not by the numbers in the press release.

    Hacker News β†—

  5. Postgres 19 delayed after AI reviewers find more bugs than people can fix

    Postgres is a free database that runs underneath a great deal of business software, and its next version has reportedly been delayed because AI review tools found more bugs than its developers can fix. It's a preview of what happens when AI finds problems faster than people can fix them, whether in code, contracts or accounts. If you bring in AI to audit something, set aside staff time to act on what it finds, or all you'll get is a longer to-do list.

    Hacker News β†—

  6. New open dataset and method published for training AI in Indian languages

    A project published on Hugging Face describes a very large collection of Indian-language text for training AI, plus an open method for creating more of it. There's nothing to do today. Over time, though, this kind of groundwork is what makes AI tools better in the languages your customers and staff actually speak, so if you gave up on AI for local-language customer service, test it again every six months or so.

    Hugging Face β†—

  7. UK competition regulator takes aim at Microsoft's grip on business software

    Britain's competition regulator is reportedly targeting Microsoft's hold on business software. This is a UK case, and it won't change your Microsoft bill in Pune or Winnipeg this year. If it does push Microsoft to change how it bundles or licenses its products, owners elsewhere may eventually get more choice, so it's worth keeping an eye on.

    StreetInsider β†—

  8. Anthropic to add voter data to Claude ahead of US midterm elections

    Several outlets report that Anthropic plans to add voter data to Claude ahead of the US midterm elections, though the reports don't say exactly what that data covers. For businesses in India and Canada this changes nothing. The habit worth keeping: don't trust any general chatbot on time-sensitive official information, such as deadlines, rules or election details, without checking the official source.

    News Radio 1190 KEX β†—

How this briefing is put together

Every morning we read the day’s AI announcements and reporting from the companies themselves and from the technology press, then pick the handful that actually change something for a working business. The analysis is ours and it is written for owners and managers, not engineers. Every story links to its original source β€” read them, and disagree with us where we’ve got it wrong.